GFO-Lite

Quick forced-choice assessment.

Want the deep version? →

Twenty-four tradeoffs. Both options have dignity — neither side is "the right answer." The pattern reveals a primary field function, two secondary roles, two shadow risks, and a developmental edge. Your responses live in this browser only.

0 of 24 answered
01 When a system blocks something important, my first instinct is to:
02 When a group has raw creative energy, I am more likely to:
03 In uncertain terrain, I am more drawn to:
04 When a boundary looks arbitrary, I tend to:
05 When a group is stuck, I usually help most by:
06 When people are defended, I tend to:
07 When someone is producing work below their capacity, I am more likely to:
08 When something old is failing, I am more likely to:
09 When people say something is impossible, I first want to know:
10 When an intense shared moment starts forming, I tend to:
11 After a rupture, my strongest impulse is to:
12 When a field has magic but no vessel, I usually:
13 When a process becomes too smooth, I worry most that:
14 When someone leaves my field, the outcome I care about most is:
15 In a new collaboration, I first look for:
16 When a group avoids the hard standard, I usually:
17 When there is no applause and no novelty, I am more likely to:
18 When people are over-enchanted by a story, I tend to:
19 When a project is dying, I feel more responsible for:
20 When intensity floods the room, I tend to:
21 When a team needs momentum, my natural move is to:
22 When I sense people orbiting me too much, the better move is to:
23 When I do not yet know what the thing is, I prefer to:
24 When the system is alive but fragile, I am more likely to:

When you finish the quick version

The deeper read lives here.

GFO-Lite returns a field function in eight minutes. GFO-Deep is the same instrument run in earnest — with scenarios, peer questions, dyadic vitality / shrinkage, and a follow-up frame designed to catch the pattern that single-snapshot assessments miss.